Probable jurisprudential opinions and ther contemporary investments in the Corona pandemic

Abstract

Activating Views in the Light of the Corona Pandemic on the margins of the Corona pandemic, many questions of legitimacy and doctrinal anecdotes have been raised that have touched almost all the doors of jurisprudence, and have given rise to a state of doctrinal mobility among a number of scholars and doctrinaires; on a variety of countries and doctrines.

This research highlights some of the advisory opinions issued by committees and advisory bodies, such as the divergence between classes in prayer and the issue of accelerating the excommunication of Zakat Al-Mal before the Hulal and others. It examines their evidence and the opinions on which they are based, and the extent to which scholars and scholars of the times have acted on the views that are in their opinions. Do these statements have a chance of considering the doctrinal heritage and doctrine, or are they all weak and idiosyncratic statements that are necessary?

The research was divided into a preface in which concepts of the title vocabulary, such as the pandemic, the corona virus and elliptical words, and two research studies were presented through which practical models were presented in which the views of the pandemic were implemented on the basis of the interests and purposes of Islamic law. This is through the portrayal of the drop-in, its legitimization and the views of scholars, together with the presentation of the face of the work with the weights and grounds for recourse.

The research found that the valid opinions expressed in the doctrinal heritage of the various doctrinal doctrines are an enormous and rich asset that can be consulted and enforced by its controls when the legitimate requirement is to do so in view of the reality of the situation, the time and the place and the purpose; There is no doubt that the use of these views and their actions in the Corona Islands is in line with the general purpose of the legislation to considerate interests and the reality, and with the facilitation of Sharia provisions and the removal of embarrassment from the mandate holders.