The poetic witness of Sibawayh between grammatical laying down and poetic necessity

Abstract

his study is tackling the poetic witness that was stated in Sibawayh’s works in which the movement of the final letter contradicts what Sibawayh and earlier grammarians abstained. Now, let’s reflect on the position of Sibawayh, whether he said: It is the movement of the rhyme or the final letter, or he used his prepositions to return this dissent to its origin, as Sibawayh and El Khalil did in the factor and applied theory. The value of this research stems from the fact that it highlights these witnesses in the most important grammatical book. Let’s get to know Sibawayh’s approach from it, and whether his position was correct, or he needs consideration and discussion? The nature of the research required two subjects, preceded by an introduction and a preamble, followed by a conclusion and a list of sources and references. The introduction examined the research plan, its significance, and the methodology used. As for the preamble, I addressed the phenomenon of contradiction between the rules of grammar, prosodic rules, music in the rhyme and the final letter, besides, the way by which scholars perceived the irregular rhyme. This research included two subjects as follows: First - Witnesses in the parsing and building of verbs, which are thirteen. Second - Witnesses in the sections of nominatives and accusatives of nouns, which are three. The conclusion summarized the most important search findings. key words: Sibawayh - Witness - Laying down - Necessity – Rhyme.