The difference in interpretations of legal texts and its effect on the jurisprudential branches according to IbnBachir through his book «El Tanbih»

Abstract

The holy Quran and the Sunnah are the origin of the evidence and the source of legislation. Their texts did not come to a single position in indicating the rules. So the dispute occurred in defining its meanings, and what is wanted by Allah. The scholars have made a big effort to invest the texts, even their opinions differed. This study aims to highlight how scholars deal with texts in order to reveal their connotations, remove the invisibility and how to extract judgments.

To sum up, one of the most important results of the research is that studying the methods of the mujtahids in explaining texts will help to acquire the faculty of Fiqh , because merely knowing the evidences and the rules will not advance the researcher to undertake the task of deduction , rather it will not it is imperative to train to employ these rules on the partial incidents, taking into account the circumstances  and the conditions to avoid including the incident outside its base or attaching the branches to other than their origins.