The legal ability of the constitutional judicature to censorship constitutionality of constitutional amendments - comparative study

Abstract

The subject of the addresses one of the important and modern issues in the constitutional field related to the ability or enabling the constitutional judicature to control constitutional amendments in some comparative constitutions and the position of the Algerian Constitution, especially in the absence of a provision authorizing or prohibiting censorship of constitutional amendments, and the role of the constitutional judicature by monitoring the extent to which the amendment authority complies with the limitations of constitutional amendment, and the position of constitutional jurisprudence and judiciary on the problem of constitutional judicature control over constitutional amendments, their legal basis, the position of the Algerian constitutional institution, the methods and scope of this control and the results of the research: So that Enabling the constitutional judicature to control constitutional amendments is a real guarantee of the protection of the constitution, even in the absence of the text, that its existence is necessary to resolve the problem of constitutional judicature oversight of constitutional amendments, their scope and limits.