Which has been done at Ibn Nadji, Through "Sharh Tafri'a"

Authors

  • ياسين شويط
  • عبد الصمد بلحاجي

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59791/ihy.v22i1.657

Keywords:

Which has been done, ibn Nadji, Which has been done in African, Which has been done in Judgment, Ibn al-Jallab

Abstract

This research addressed one of the scholars of Maliki jurisprudence in the ninth century, imam and judge Abu al-Qasim Issa bin Nadji al-Tanoukhi and his contributions to the field of jurisprudence and judiciary, by highlighting one of the most specific jurisprudence and jurisprudence and attaching it to the Maliki doctrine, which is 'Which has been done', by trying to trace his releases and uses of this rule and touch some of the features oftunisian and African work established in his time through the provisions of the 'work', as well as the research of his jurisprudence and applications built by the judiciary in the field of jurisprudence. With this doctrinal rule, all of this is considered in one of his brilliant jurisprudential works, 'Explaining tafriaibn al-Jallab.

Published

2022-01-15

How to Cite

شويط ي., & بلحاجي ع. ا. (2022). Which has been done at Ibn Nadji, Through "Sharh Tafri’a". El Ihyaa, 22(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.59791/ihy.v22i1.657

Issue

Section

المقالات