إحياء منهج التدليل في التصنيف الفقهي المالكي المعاصر- الضرورة - الصور والمتطلبات-

Abstract

The lawful argumentations are the most important brace on which the rulings of Islamic jurisprudence are based and clamps tightly together. Hence, the current investigation explores the issue of reviving the argumentation approach in Al- Maliki 's contemporary jurisprudential authorship by highlighting the need to revive and activate it in our era. By stating the most important benefits achieved in Islamic jurisprudence, we confirmed the authenticity of this approach in the Maliki’s doctrine especially for the precedents even if it is common for the doctrine the predominance of the abstraction approach in the latecomers for reasons investigated by the study. Moreover, the research focuses on elaborating cases of reviving the argumentation approach in Maliki 's contemporary authorship highliting the requirements and models of each of these cases. Consequently, on the basis of the data emanated from the study, a number of results and recommendations were provided in the conclusion of the investigation.