The balance of power theory (ies) in international relations: a reading in theoretical ramifications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59791/efas.v8i3.1232Keywords:
balance of power theory, balance of threat theory, omnibalacing theory, bandwagoning for profit theoryAbstract
Although the prevailing belief in the theoretical literature of international relations is that there is only one version the balance of power theory is and agreed upon, but There are so many versions of balance-of-power theory that we cannot even list them all, let alone survey or test them. Our focus is on what might rightly be regarded as the core/foundational proposition of the theory, which posits that because units in anarchic systems have an interest in maximizing their long-term odds on survival (security), they will check concentrations of power (hegemony) by building up their own capabilities (internal balancing), aggregating their capabilities with those of other units in alliances (external balancing)
On the whole, the aim of this research paper is to focus on the most fundamental points of view to explain the balance of power in international relations, within its theoretical framework, research and investigation of the arguments presented by each opinion.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.