الاختلاف الفقهي في الأموال الزكوية وأثره على حصيلة الزكاة وتقنين أحكامها في ضوء قانون الزكاة السوداني

Abstract

The research revolves around the deals in particular with the jurisprudence of funds that are subject to zakat, the implications of the juristic difference in its pot, and its effect on its revenues, and explores options for the Sudanese legislator in matters of Zakat through the articles of the Zakat Law. The research concluded that the Zakat revenues are closely related to the juristic difference in the issues of Zakat, whereby choosing a specific jurisprudence opinion and leaving other opinions leads to an increase or decrease in Zakat revenues, and that the Sudanese Zakat Law took the broadest doctrines and opinions in Zakat to take into account the interests of those who deserve it, just as the Sudanese legislator did not commit to His choices in Maliki doctrine, although it is the prevailing juristic doctrine in Sudan, but the law took many opinions from other doctrines, and even some contemporary jurisprudence.