The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman

Abstract

Perelman and Titka worked in their work on the argumentation to rid the
argumentation of argumentation both rhetoric and logic، in order to rid the rhetoric of
the severe defamation and slander that befell it، they made the pilgrims become
convinced and act in the light of this conviction secondly. Propaganda، debate is about
specific opinions، while rhetoric is always about specific (subjective) opinions.
The premises are considered a primary factor in the argumentative process،
which necessitates the preacher to choose and use these data in a manner consistent
with his audience. In order to achieve persuasion، it is intended to bring the idea to
mind، because the present is flaring and the emotion of the listener. With penetration
and depth، Perelman goes to talk about rhetoric and philosophy، and the choice of this
position was not in vain or the product of a passing moment، but rather was the throes
of an observation after 50 years of study، in which he concluded that the subject was
not raised or discussed by philosophers before، rhetoric is very far from Philosophy
interests.